The most universal way to support a point is to provide a reference to a source which backs it up: either someone who agrees with you, or evidence that supports you. As your studies progress, this strategy may need to become more in depth, perhaps referencing multiple sources or commenting critically on them. One reference is good, but might be overly selective, ignoring contradictory or better sources. What counts as acceptable evidence will vary depending on your subject. A

AI-generated text is quietly starting to infiltrate our daily lives, which has made AI detection more critical than ever. It's especially critical in the classroom, where having the most accurate AI detector is your best line of defense against AI plagiarism. AI detectors work by analyzing text for patterns, specifically measuring how predictable it is (perplexity) and how much sentence structures vary (burstiness). They use machine learning models, often similar to the AI th

As artificial intelligence transforms how evidence is created and presented, courts and legal professionals must adapt. This guidance features a webinar and two bench cards to help judges evaluate AI-generated content and ensure fair, informed decisions that preserve the integrity of judicial proceedings. AI-generated evidence is becoming more common and more complex. While fabricated evidence is not a new problem in state courts, the rise in accessibility of artificial intel

The AI Act Explorer - The European Union has introduced new legislation on artificial intelligence: The EU AI Act. It lays the foundations for the regulation of AI in the EU. The purpose of this Regulation is to improve the functioning of the internal market and promote the uptake of human-centric and trustworthy artificial intelligence (AI), while ensuring a high level of protection of health, safety, fundamental rights enshrined in the Charter, including democracy, the rule